- #Corel vs adobe for drawing pro
- #Corel vs adobe for drawing software
- #Corel vs adobe for drawing free
- #Corel vs adobe for drawing mac
I think integration with 3D will be the biggest thing now, taking your models to 2D linework will save soo much more time.
#Corel vs adobe for drawing pro
I read that Corel acquired Jasc in 2004 and it now has vector capabilities with its newest release "PaintShop Photo Pro X3"
Back then I didn't know what I was doing, Jasc paintshop pro was my drawing program of choice but it was all raster base. I think I dabbled in it a bit back when corel was releasing its suite 8 in 98'. I have very little knowledge on Coreldraw. Even if you use a workaround of exporting to a higher resolution (say 600 dpi), then scale the line art back down to 350 dpi in Photoshop, it is still hopelessly inferior to the now-ancient Illustrator 9 which had the best exported line quality."
#Corel vs adobe for drawing software
The problem with rendering (rasterizing) line-work has nothing to do with document resolution - it is a problem with how the software "averages" (smoothes) the stair-step effect when rendering a line that is at a steep angle (ie. In addition, the rasterizing/export function in Adobe Illustrator CS/CS2 creates very rough line quality with a noticeable stair-stepping effect when converting a vector file to a Photoshop raster file.
#Corel vs adobe for drawing mac
Because of this bug, you must boot to Mac OS9 (or earlier) so that you can use Adobe Illustrator 9 (or earlier) to do the exporting (very annoying). "There is a known software bug in Adobe Illustrator CS/10 and Adobe Illustrator CS2 that will not allow you to export a file to Photoshop that is larger than 28 inches/300 dpi. Here's a case that Hulsey made about CS/CS2 where the older verisons of Illustrator actually happen to be superior. I guess I'm being picky but it shows that there are many areas that can be improved to speed up time in Illustrator. Instead you have to manually align it up all the time. It would be nice if there was a snap to function within the transform tool options that would allow you to quickly snap your grouped object inside of a box already placed into the perspective you want. The transform tool can only transform a specific number of objects within a group before it becomes to complex to do so.
For instance there are issues that occur when expanding strokes to outlines, and the snap to function behaves pretty buggy on occassion. I know they added things like live trace, extra stroke options and a grid tool to their repitiore but it doesn't really address some of the more common problems encountered when creating vector based illustrations. So if that made you angry, hey you'll get over it!Īdobe hasn't really made any vast improvements to their illustrator software in awhile, in some cases these updates have even made the program less functionable and sluggish. Of course, considering the current state of education, it would probably be to much to expect educators to do any research on programs.
#Corel vs adobe for drawing free
They give free copies of their “also ran product” to all schools, which is why educators love it. Why? Because I can do in three steps using CorelDRAW what it would take five steps to do in Adobe Illustrator. I will say that I believe CorelDRAW beats Adobe Illustrator hands down. And in fact I removed and discarded AI from my computer last year. The rest of my computer illustrations were done using CorelDRAW, AutoCAD, and TurboCAD. It's based on 35 years experience as a technical illustrator (21 as a digital TI.) In all that time I created exactly one technical illustration in Adobe Illustrator. So what I'm about to say is not meant to cause ill feeling. Believe me this take guts, but I've run into this problem for a while.
0 kommentar(er)
